Thursday, 13 September 2012

Cost effective bridge compared to expensive, unsustainable ferry.


Cost effective bridge compared to expensive, unsustainable ferry.

A recent estimate of a bridge system to replace the Gabriola ferry, by the previous minister of Transportation, Blair Lekstrom, was $100 million. This is up from $35 million when the NDP created the Islands Trust and incorporated into the Official Community Plan in 1974. Since that time millions have been spent on ferry fares by Gabriola residents and their service providers. We are left with a ferry, that will have to be replaced and future fuel, labour, and terminal expenses that are unsustainable.

At the present time $6 million is spent annually for the Gabriola Ferry service, $5 million by the user group, and the balance by the Provincial taxpayers. This money could pay off the cost of the bridge system in about 20 years leaving a very inexpensive transportation system that could be supported by tolls. There would be a need for a passenger only service to downtown Nanaimo and a bus service that would use the bridge.

Why are we being forced to accept an expensive, unsustainable ferry option, compared to a far more effective bridge system?
The Province has just let the contract for a Public Engagement Process, to canvass coastal communities for their opinions on the future of the Ferry system. The Southern Gulf Islands, largely Saltspring Island, have an annual subsidy of $26 million and this does not include the collected fares by the user groups. In the case of Saltspring Island we are talking about $1 billion going down the drain every 20 years! Not sustainable in a competitive world.

Individuals that want to keep the ferries should pay the largest proportion, those that would prefer an inexpensive bridge system, should pay a lot less.

Sincerely, Jeremy Baker, Gabriola Island.

Monday, 10 September 2012

Duke Point not closing!


Duke Point not closing! Unless the Government says, “Close the Terminal”.
In the Nanaimo Daily News article discussing the proposed closure of the Duke Point Terminal, the writer referred to an upcoming Public Engagement Process. I will take that opportunity to present the case for eliminating the Gabriola Ferry/two terminals/ the subsidy and replacing the service with a bridge system similar to the one put forward by the NDP in 1974, but without the mainland ferry terminal.

The current estimate for a bridge system from the Ministry of Transportation is $100 million. Gabriola residents and their goods and services providers, spend $5 million a year for the ferry costs. The bridge construction debt could be paid down in approximately 20 years. The bridge system would have a 100 year life span, giving us 80 years of inexpensive transportation.
The big question is: why, if we know the most cost effective way of transporting goods and services, are we being forced to use the most expensive way? 

Sincerely, Jeremy Baker.
Gabriola Island.